But we have fallen short of the necessary interconnection that we have in mind when we speak of [&Ns|&Np].
We thus have a pure synthesis of apprehension.
And similarly with all the others.
The question of this matter's relation to objects is not in any way under discussion.
This distinction must have some ground in the nature of [&Ns|&Np].
The divisions are thus provided; all that is required is to fill them.
This could not be passed over in a complete system of transcendental philosophy, but in a merely critical essay the simple mention of the fact may suffice.
This is not something we are in a position to establish.
This is the sense in which it is to be understood in this work.
But this need not worry us.
Let us apply this to &Ns.
But to this matter no answer is possible.
But the proof of this is a task from which we can here be absolved.
But at present we shall turn our attention to &Ns.
This may become clear with an example.
I feel I have sufficiently shown this to be true.
This is what chiefly concerns us.
On this matter, what has been said already should in any case suffice by itself.
In my present remarks I am referring to &Ns only in so far as it is founded on &judgement-type principles.
